Close-up of a four-point probe tester measuring a sample with precision.

How to Choose the Right Probe for Four-Point Measurements: A Complete Guide for Purchasing and Engineering

Choosing the correct probe is critical for accurate four point probe measurements. This article provides a practical and technical guide to four point probe probe selection, explaining the impact of probe materials, tip geometry, contact pressure, and fixed probe spacing. It compares tungsten carbide sharp tips and gold-plated round tips, clarifies their advantages and limitations, and outlines how different sample types influence probe choice. The guide is written for engineers, researchers, and purchasing professionals who need reliable measurement results while minimizing sample damage and long-term testing costs.

Alloy Probe with gold plated

Our four-point probe tester and automatic test stand are suitable for measuring sheet resistance and resistivity across materials such as silicon wafers, thin films, and flexible electronics.

Contents show

Why Probe Selection Is Critical in Four-Point Measurements

In four-point probe measurements of resistivity or sheet resistance, the quality of mechanical and electrical contact between the probe tips and the sample directly determines the accuracy and repeatability of the results.

If the wrong probe type is selected, the consequences are often not just “a bit of noise” but:

  • Excessive contact resistance → measured values are too high or unstable
  • Poor local contact → noisy or drifting voltage readings
  • Scratches, dents, or cracks on the sample surface → high-value samples may be permanently damaged
  • Poor repeatability in batch testing → difficult to set and maintain reliable process controls

For purchasing, the probe is not just a “small accessory that comes with the instrument”. It directly affects:

  • The upper limit of your test capability
  • Sample safety during measurement
  • Long-term operating and maintenance costs in the lab or on the production line

Choosing the right probe type at the purchasing stage is almost always more economical than repeatedly replacing probes and re-testing damaged or questionable samples later.

Core Differences Between Tungsten Carbide Sharp Tips and Round Tips

(Material + Geometry + Application Positioning)

In modern four-point probe systems, the two most common probe tip geometries are:

  • Sharp tips
  • Round tips

In our standard configuration, they are clearly differentiated by material, tip geometry, and intended application:

  • Sharp tips: made of tungsten carbide (WC)
  • Round tips: alloy body with gold-plated spherical tip

First, a critical clarification: probe spacing ≠ tip radius

Many first-time users confuse “probe spacing” with “how sharp the tip is”.
In practice, these are two completely different parameters:

Geometric ParameterCentre-to-centre distance between adjacent probe tipsTypical Value in Our SystemsPrimary Influence
Probe spacingCenter-to-center distance between adjacent probe tips1 mm (fixed)Current distribution, geometric correction factor, calculation formula
Tip radius“Sharpness” of a single probe tipSharp: ~40–100 µm; Round: ~200–500 µmContact area and local pressure, risk of sample damage, contact resistance

Important note

  • In our four-point probe systems, the probe spacing is fixed at 1 mm, which is a geometric design parameter and independent of whether you use sharp or round tips.
  • Values like “40–100 µm” or “200–500 µm” refer to tip radius, not probe spacing.

Key characteristics of tungsten carbide sharp tips

  • High hardness and wear resistance
    Tungsten carbide is a very hard material, ideal for long-term, repetitive measurements.
  • Small tip radius (typically 40–100 µm)
    A smaller contact area means higher local pressure at the same mechanical load, making it easier to pierce thin oxide layers or light contamination and achieve low contact resistance.
  • Well-suited for medium-to-low resistance materials
    On hard materials such as silicon wafers, metal films, or thick ITO films, sharp tips typically yield highly stable, highly repeatable measurement results.
  • Long life and reasonable total cost of ownership
    In high-throughput applications, the cost per measurement is relatively low.

Key characteristics of gold-plated alloy round tips

  • Alloy shank + gold-plated spherical tip
    The alloy body offers more compliant mechanical behaviour, while the gold-plated surface provides stable electrical conductivity and excellent oxidation resistance.
  • Spherical or rounded tip (typically 200–500 µm radius)
    A larger contact area significantly reduces local pressure, making contact much gentler to the sample.
  • Ideal for soft, thin, or brittle samples
    Round tips significantly reduce the risk of scratching, collapsing, or cracking the surface.
  • Protects high-value samples
    When samples are expensive, limited in quantity, or require reuse for further characterisation (AFM/SEM/optical profilometry, etc.), round tips are often the safer and more sustainable choice.

For quick comparison:

ItemTungsten Carbide Sharp TipGold-Plated Alloy Round Tip
MaterialTungsten carbide (WC)Alloy body + gold plating
Tip radiusSmall, approx. 40–100 µmLarge, approx. 200–500 µm
Local pressureHighLow
Contact resistanceLow and stableSlightly higher but can be stable
Sample damage riskMedium to high (for soft/thin samples)Very low (suitable for flexible/brittle samples)
Typical applicationsSilicon wafers, metals, hard substratesFlexible films, touch screens, nano-coatings, high-value samples

Unified Automatic Test Stand Design for Four-Point Probes

Automatic four-point probe test stand

Structure of the automatic test stand used for both sharp-tip and round-tip probe configurations.
The probe head is precisely driven down onto the sample stage, ensuring stable four-point contact. The probe contact force is automatically controlled and factory-verified, requiring no manual adjustment during operation. Different probe configurations are selected based on sample type and application requirements.

The probe contact force is automatically controlled and factory-verified as part of the probe assembly and test stand design, requiring no manual adjustment during operation.

A Practical “Hard / Soft” Classification Method

In real-world communication between purchasing staff and engineers, it’s not always realistic to ask everyone to provide complete material parameters at the start.

As a convenient shortcut, we recommend a very intuitive first step:
Classify the sample surface as “hard/dense” or “soft/thin/brittle”.

Typical samples are closer to “hard materials”

  • Silicon wafers (single-crystal or polycrystalline), compound semiconductor wafers
  • Conductive thin films or transparent conductive films on glass substrates (e.g., ITO)
  • Metal sheets, metal foils, ceramic substrates, sintered blocks
  • Other hard, dense industrial materials

→ Usually, tungsten carbide sharp tips are the preferred choice.


Typical samples are closer to “soft/thin/brittle materials”

  • Transparent conductive films on flexible plastic substrates (PI, PET, TPU, etc.)
  • Porous materials, powder compacts, loosely sintered blocks
  • Extremely thin functional films or nano-layers with a high risk of deformation
  • Flexible printed circuits, flexible displays, flexible sensors
  • Finished or semi-finished touch screen stacks, cover glass structures with functional layers

→ Usually, gold-plated alloy round tips are the preferred choice.

As long as purchasing or technical staff can describe the sample using these categories, in most cases, it’s already possible to make a correct initial probe selection.


Typical Use Cases for Tungsten Carbide Sharp Tips

When the sample has sufficient mechanical strength and surface hardness, tungsten carbide sharp tips are often the better option.
They are exceptionally cost-effective in applications where you need:

  • High repeatability
  • Low contact resistance
  • High-volume or routine testing
four probe tester sharp tips---tungsten carbide

Tungsten carbide sharp-tip four-point probe, featuring high hardness and wear resistance. It is particularly suitable for sheet resistance measurements on hard materials such as silicon wafers, glass, and metals.

Recommended scenarios for tungsten carbide sharp tips

Silicon and hard-substrate applications

  • Conductive or diffusion layers on single-crystal or polycrystalline silicon wafers
  • Conductive and transparent conductive films on glass, ceramic, or metal substrates
  • Resistivity measurements of compound semiconductor devices

Applications requiring high data quality

  • Medium-to-low resistance materials, higher test currents, and precise sheet resistance/resistivity evaluation
  • Frequent repeated measurements on the same batch or material type where contact stability is critical
  • Critical process control in wafer fabs, display panel factories, etc.

Applications are less sensitive to minor surface impressions

  • Samples used as “process intermediates” that will be polished or processed downstream
  • Experiments focusing primarily on accurate electrical parameters rather than cosmetic appearance

Expert note: “Penetration effect” for ultra-thin films

For skinny conductive films (e.g., < 20–50 nm), even if they are on rigid substrates like silicon:

  • High local pressure from sharp tips may mechanically puncture the film.
  • The tip can then contact the underlying substrate directly.
  • The measured resistance may be significantly lower than expected, in extreme cases reflecting primarily the substrate resistance.
  • This may also interfere with later surface analyses such as AFM or SEM.

In such cases, we recommend:

  • Start with a moderate load or slightly larger tip radius and observe;
  • First, use round tips for preliminary evaluation, then carefully test with sharp tips under controlled pressure, if higher precision is needed.

Typical Use Cases for Round Tips

Round tips prioritise sample protection and gentle contact, which is especially important in:

  • Emerging materials research
  • High-value prototype samples
  • Flexible electronics and ultra-thin films

Their primary value lies not in extreme electrical performance but in reducing the risk of mechanical damage and the sample scrap rate.

Round-tip four-point probe head with a larger contact area and lower local pressure. It is especially suitable for fragile samples, such as flexible films, touchscreens, and nanocoatings.

four probe tester Round tips---Alloy Probe with gold plated

Recommended scenarios for round tips

Flexible and touch-related applications

  • Conductive layers on flexible displays, flexible circuits, and flexible sensors
  • Transparent conductive films on touch screens and cover glass (especially finished or semi-finished devices)
  • Performance verification and reliability testing of flexible electronic products

Fragile, high-value, or limited-quantity samples

  • High-cost nano-materials, small batches of research samples that cannot tolerate visible surface damage
  • Porous, loose, or brittle materials where localised high pressure can cause collapse or cracking
  • Characterisation samples in high-end R&D projects, where preserving the original surface condition is critical

Ultra-thin / delicate films

  • Ultra-thin metal layers, transparent conductive films, with a high risk of scratching
  • Samples that will undergo further optical or surface topography analysis (AFM, SEM, 3D profilometry)
  • Thin nano-layers, delicate functional films that must remain intact for multiple test techniques

Application Scenario Example – Choosing Round Tips for Flexible Electronics

If your samples are on flexible plastic substrates such as PI or PET, or are part of a touch-screen stack or flexible display structure, we recommend round tips.
They provide significantly better protection for the sample, greatly reducing the risk of visible dents or scratches during testing.
Especially in research and development, preserving the original condition of rare samples is often more important than chasing absolute theoretical limits in measurement accuracy.


Basic Principles of the Four-Point Probe Method

Understanding the basic principles of the four-point probe method helps explain why probe selection is so important.
The method uses four equally spaced probes:

  • The outer two probes inject current
  • The inner two probes measure voltage

From the measured voltage and current, we can calculate sheet resistance or bulk resistivity.

Principles of sheet resistance measurement

measurement principle( sheet resistance) for four probe tester

Basic principle of sheet resistance measurement using a four-point probe. The figure shows current flow and voltage measurement points on a thin-film sample. From the measured voltage V and current I, the sheet resistance (Ω/sq) can be calculated.

Sheet resistance is a key parameter describing the conductivity of thin-film materials. It is especially relevant for films with reasonably uniform thickness.

In applications such as IC manufacturing, flat-panel displays, and transparent conductive films, sheet resistance is an important process control indicator.

The contact quality of the probes directly affects the accuracy of the measured voltage:

Tungsten carbide sharp tips often measure low-resistance thin films more accurately because of their low contact resistance.

Round tips may have slightly higher contact resistance, but they protect fragile films much better. As long as the contact is stable and repeatable, they still provide sufficient accuracy for many applications.


Principles of bulk resistivity measurement

Schematic model for bulk resistivity measurement using the four-point probe method. It is suitable for block or thicker materials. Effective probe depth can be tuned by adjusting probe spacing, allowing adaptation to different sample thicknesses.

For bulk materials, powder compacts, or relatively thick samples, the four-point method can be used to measure bulk resistivity (ρ), typically expressed in Ω·cm.

Unlike sheet resistance, bulk resistivity calculations explicitly include sample thickness. This is especially important when evaluating:

  • Porous materials
  • Ceramics
  • Composite materials and sintered bodies

In such applications:

Tungsten carbide sharp tips are better suited to dense, hard blocks.

Round tips, due to their lower local pressure, are usually better for porous or fragile samples.

measurement principle( resistivity) for four probe tester

Practical Steps for Purchasing Decisions

Whether in industry or academia, purchasing staff can follow the steps below to make more informed decisions and communicate more clearly with internal technical teams.

Step 1: Collect basic information

Ask the user department to describe briefly:

  • Sample type: silicon wafer, glass, flexible film, powder compact, etc.
  • Damage tolerance: Can the sample tolerate visible dents or scratches?
  • Sample value: Are samples expensive or in limited quantity?
  • Expected resistance range: mainly high-resistance or low-resistance materials?
  • Test frequency: one-time evaluation, or routine, high-volume testing?

Step 2: Match a probe configuration (reference table)

Sample characteristicsRecommended probeKey benefit
Hard, dense (silicon, glass, metal, etc.)Tungsten carbide sharp tipStable contact, accurate data, low long-term cost
Soft, thin, brittleGold-plated alloy round tipLow local pressure avoids structural collapse
Flexible substrates (plastic, touch stacks, etc.)Round tipProtects the sample, reduces damage, and is suitable for high-value samples
Powder compacts, porous materialsRound tipLow local pressure, avoids structural collapse
High-volume industrial testing (wafers, ITO glass, etc.)Tungsten carbide sharp tipHigh repeatability and throughput

Step 3: Confirm the configuration

  • For single-type applications, select the probe type that best matches your primary sample category.
  • For mixed sample types: consider buying two configurations (e.g., one sharp-tip probe head and one round-tip probe head) to handle different materials.

If you really cannot decide which probe to use

If you are unsure which type of probe is appropriate for your samples, please contact us.
We can first evaluate your application based on material information, and we also provide sample testing services:

  • You send us small sample sets;
  • Our engineers test them with different probe configurations;
  • We document the results and provide a test report plus configuration recommendation.
    This helps you make the correct purchasing decision before large-scale investment, minimizing trial-and-error cost and sample damage risk.
gutengbao bianji-thanks

Recommended Dual-Stand Configuration for Universities and Research Institutes

For university labs, research institutes, and multi-user R&D centres, research directions over the next few years are often uncertain. Such environments typically:

  • Test silicon-based hard materials
  • Gradually expand into flexible electronics, nano-thin films, functional ceramics, and composites

Based on our shipping experience, more and more laboratories now choose the configuration:

One main unit + two automatic test stands

  • The central unit provides a current source, voltage measurement, computation, and software control
  • Automatic test stand A: equipped with tungsten carbide sharp tips → for silicon wafers, metals, glass, and other hard samples
  • Automatic test stand B: equipped with gold-plated alloy round tips → for flexible films, nano-layers, and high-value, fragile samples

With this configuration:

Test stand A: sharp-tip configuration

  • Dedicated to silicon wafers, glass substrates, metal substrates, and other hard materials
  • Ideal for teaching labs, basic device characterisation, and routine batch testing
  • Helps establish standard operating procedures and student training workflows

Test stand B: round-tip configuration

  • Dedicated to flexible substrates, touch structures, nano-films, and high-value samples
  • At early project stages, you can use round tips to perform an initial electrical evaluation to avoid unnecessary damage
  • Provides flexibility for new materials and innovative projects, minimising sample loss risk

Core advantages of a dual-stand configuration

Reduced the need for frequent re-mounting of probe heads

  • No need to constantly swap probe heads on the same stand
  • Lower risk of misalignment or mechanical errors
  • Each stand can be configured and maintained for a specific sample type

Better lab management

  • Different research groups or projects can choose the appropriate stand based on the material type.
  • Standardised procedures can map “sample type → stand ID → probe type”
  • Easier to schedule maintenance and define probe replacement cycles

Support for future research expansion

  • As the lab explores new materials, the dual configuration can immediately support new testing needs.
  • Avoids poor data or sample damage due to using the wrong probe type

Long-term cost effectiveness

  • Upfront investment is slightly higher, but long-term hidden costs (scrapped samples, repeated tests, downtime) are significantly reduced.
  • For labs and R&D centres, this is often the more “strategic” configuration choice.e

Recommended configuration for universities and research labs:
Purchase one four-point probe main unit plus two automatic test stands — one with tungsten carbide sharp tips and one with gold-plated round tips. This dual-stand setup can handle everything from conventional silicon-based materials to flexible electronics and nano-materials, while significantly reducing sample damage and maintenance cost over the long term.


A Fast Decision Formula for Purchasing

To help non-technical colleagues make quick decisions, we can simplify the logic into a three-step formula:

Step 1: Ask one key question

“Does the sample surface behave more like a hard material or a soft/thin/brittle material?”

Step 2: Map the answer

  • If the answer is “hard” (e.g., silicon wafers, glass, metals):
    → Prefer tungsten carbide sharp tips for better electrical contact and data stability.
  • If the answer is “soft/thin/brittle” (e.g., flexible films, touch structures, nano-coatings):
    → Prefer round tips to protect the surface.

Step 3: Confirm and place the order

  • Use simple application analogies to double-check with engineers
  • If uncertainty remains, suggest a technical call or email discussion
  • If still undecided, consider sending samples for us to evaluate with both probe types before finalising the purchase

FAQ

Q1: Can the probe spacing be changed in four-point measurements?

A: In our systems, the probe spacing is fixed at 1 mm, which aligns with standard four-point probe geometries.
Probe spacing is a geometric design parameter and should not be arbitrarily changed; otherwise, the calculation model and geometric correction factors will no longer apply.


Q2: How does tip radius influence measurement results?

A: Smaller tip radius → smaller contact area → higher local pressure at the same load:

  • Easier to pierce oxide or contamination
  • Lower contact resistance
  • Higher risk of surface damage

Larger tip radius (round tips) → lower local pressure:

  • Better sample protection
  • Slightly higher contact resistance
  • Better suited to thin, soft, or brittle samples

Q3: Can tungsten carbide sharp tips be used on soft samples?

A: Theoretically, yes, but we do not recommend it.
On soft, flexible, or brittle materials, the high local pressure from sharp tips can:

  • Create deep dents
  • Scratch the surface
  • Puncture very thin films

Unless you are certain surface damage is acceptable, round tips are usually the safer option.


Q4: Do round tips significantly compromise measurement accuracy?

A: In most practical applications, they do not. As long as:

  • Contact is stable
  • The load is consistent
  • The surface is reasonably clean

Round tips can provide sufficiently accurate and repeatable sheet resistance or resistivity results.
For extremely low-resistance materials or very tight process control, you may compare with sharp tips for verification.


Q5: Is it OK to frequently change probe heads on the same test stand?

A: No. In our four-point probe systems, the probe tips themselves are not designed to be frequently replaced or interchanged.

Each probe head is factory-assembled and precisely calibrated before shipment. During this process, the contact force of all four probes is carefully matched and verified to ensure uniform pressure and consistent electrical contact. This is critical for achieving accurate, repeatable four-point measurements.

If individual probe tips were removed or replaced in the field, it would disrupt this force balance and compromise measurement reliability.

For applications that require testing different types of samples, the recommended approach is not to change probe tips, but to use separate automatic test stands, each preconfigured with the appropriate probe type (for example, one stand with tungsten carbide sharp tips and another with gold-plated round tips).

This approach preserves factory calibration, maintains long-term repeatability, and avoids unnecessary measurement uncertainty.

Q6: How can I tell whether a problem is due to contact issues or material properties?

A: You can check the following:

  • Slightly vary the probe load: if results change dramatically, contact is likely unstable
  • Test multiple positions on the same sample: excessive scatter suggests contact issues
  • Inspect the probe tips for contamination or oxidation
  • Try another probe type or a fresh probe head for comparison

If the root cause is still unclear, you can send samples to us for diagnostic testing.


Q7: Which probes are recommended for ultra-thin nano-films (<20–50 nm)?

A: These samples are highly sensitive to mechanical damage and penetration:

  1. Start with gold-plated round tips at low load.
  2. If higher precision is needed, consider controlled tests with sharp tips while monitoring for penetration or damage (e.g., via microscope or AFM).

The exact choice depends on the trade-off between data requirements and sample safety.


Q8: Why do so many university labs adopt “one main unit + two automatic stands”?

A: Because university and research labs:

  • Deal with the broadest variety of materials
  • Have constantly changing research topics and user groups
  • Often test rare, high-value samples that cannot be replaced

The configuration “one main controller + stand A (sharp tips) + stand B (round tips)” gives them:

  • Flexibility for future research
  • Better sample protection
  • Less need to repeatedly mount and align probe heads
  • More robust long-term repeatability

Q9: How is the probe load force handled in your four-point probe measurements? Do users need to adjust it?

A: In our four-point probe systems, the probe load force does not require user adjustment.

The measurement is performed using a fully automatic test stand. Once the probe head makes controlled contact with the sample surface, the system immediately initiates the measurement sequence. After the measurement is completed, the probes automatically retract, and the results are displayed on the connected computer.

The contact force applied during measurement is predefined and factory-verified as part of the probe assembly and test stand design. This ensures:

  • Consistent contact conditions for every measurement
  • Uniform force across all four probes
  • High repeatability without operator-dependent variation

Because the load is controlled automatically, users do not need to tune pressure parameters during routine testing manually. This design minimises operator influence, simplifies operation, and improves long-term data consistency—especially in multi-user environments such as university laboratories and shared research facilities.

Q10: What if I really cannot decide which type of probe to purchase?

A: In that case, a small up-front evaluation can save you a lot of trouble later:

If you are unsure which probe type to use, please contact us.
We can provide sample test services, generate a detailed test report, and help you make the correct purchasing decision.

You can:

  • Share your sample structure, material, and expected resistance range.
  • Or send a small set of representative samples to us;
  • Our engineers will test them using both sharp and round tips.
  • We provide the data comparison and configuration recommendations.

This approach helps you finalise the configuration confidently before making a larger investment.


Summary and Action Points

Choosing the proper probe for four-point measurements may look like a minor detail, but it directly determines:

  • Measurement success or failure
  • Sample safety
  • Long-term cost and efficiency

Using the “hard/soft” classification, application examples, and quick decision logic in this guide, purchasing staff and engineers can:

  • More accurately choose between tungsten carbide sharp tips and gold-plated round tips
  • Better protect high-value or irreplaceable samples
  • Design a configuration that supports both current needs and future expansion

Core recommendations at a glance

Application typeRecommended configurationKey reasons
Hard materials (silicon, glass, metals)Tungsten carbide sharp tipsStable data, low contact resistance, robust durability
Soft/flexible/brittle materialsGold-plated round tipsSample protection, reduced damage risk
High-value / limited samplesRound tipsPrioritize sample safety over theoretical extremes
High-volume industrial testingTungsten carbide sharp tipsHigh throughput, excellent repeatability
Universities / R&D centersOne main unit + two automatic stands (sharp + round)Flexibility, lower risk, less reconfiguration

Five things you can do immediately

  1. List your main sample types from the past year (materials and quantities).
  2. Classify them into “hard/soft / high-value”.
  3. Discuss with your technical team whether you need both sharp and round tips or a dual-stand configuration.
  4. Create an internal mapping between “sample type → probe type → test stand ID” for future projects.
  5. If you still have questions, contact us or consider sending sample sets for evaluation before large-scale procurement.

Contact Us

If you have any questions about four-point probe systems, probe selection, or application-specific configurations, feel free to contact us:

gutengbao bianji-thanks

We can provide:

  • Probe selection advice (sharp vs. round, custom tip radius, etc.)
  • Sample testing services (send samples → we test → you get a report → you decide)
  • Dual-stand configuration proposals for universities, research institutes, and multi-user labs

Appendix: Basic Circuit and Workflow of the Four-Point Probe Method

Circuit diagram of the four-point collinear probe method. Probes 1 and 4 (outer) supply current, while probes 2 and 3 (inner) measure voltage, minimizing the influence of lead resistance on the measurement results.

The four-point method effectively eliminates lead resistance errors through functional separation of the four probes:

  • Outer probes (1 and 4): act as current leads, injecting a known constant current
  • Inner probes (2 and 3): act as voltage sense leads with very high impedance, measuring voltage without drawing current

Choosing the correct probe type is about ensuring that this “current–voltage separation” works optimally in real contact conditions—
so you get accurate electrical results while keeping your samples safe.

The-Four-Point-Collinear-Probe-Method

Conclusion and Further Reading

Choosing the proper probe configuration is only one part of building a reliable four-point probe measurement system. Probe geometry, materials, and automated contact control work together with the tester platform, software, and application environment to determine long-term measurement accuracy and repeatability.

If you are planning a new four-point probe setup, expanding a university laboratory, or evaluating different system architectures, the following resources may also be helpful:

Together, these articles form a practical knowledge base covering probe selection, automatic test platforms, thin-film measurements, and system-level purchasing considerations. They are intended to help engineers, researchers, and purchasing professionals make informed decisions based on application requirements rather than assumptions.

If you are unsure which configuration best fits your samples or test environment, our technical team can also provide sample evaluation and testing support to help you determine the most appropriate solution before procurement.

gutengbao bianji-thanks
Betty Wang, Marketing Manager at Hangzhou Qiansineng Technology Co., LTD, smiling outdoors by the scenic West Lake.